What this means in practice and what it does not mean
This results in significantly more degrees of freedom for existing SAP customers in designing their own maintenance and support strategy. This particularly concerns:
- Division of the SAP landscape into multiple Commercial Installations: Landscape components can be separated technically and contractually and maintained differently.
- Different support models per landscape component depending on the criticality and lifecycle of the respective system.
- New options for reducing licenses no longer needed through termination rights in the newly defined scenarios.
- Facilitation of carve-outs and restructuring through clearly regulated transfer and termination options for divestitures of business units.
- Broader access to Single Metric Contracts for larger contract volumes, which can simplify license calculation.
- Lower costs for later re-entry into SAP maintenance without the previously customary reinstatement fees and with lower back payments.
However, these new regulations do not automatically mean that a complete exit from SAP maintenance makes sense for every company. What is decisive is which systems still require manufacturer support, which landscape components can continue to operate stably without SAP maintenance, and where alternative or hybrid models, such as with third-party providers, are economically viable. A blanket cancellation without reliable analysis of one’s own landscape can lead to risks in security, compliance, and system stability.